They're not to scale. It's a photo shop job. The wheels are only 15". Need tall tyres.They look good IMO. The only thing I would say is that they look a bit big for a '60s look car.
They're not to scale. It's a photo shop job. The wheels are only 15". Need tall tyres.They look good IMO. The only thing I would say is that they look a bit big for a '60s look car.
Ah I see! Had me fooled (not difficult admittedly).They're not to scale. It's a photo shop job. The wheels are only 15". Need tall tyres.
But you are correct. To get a proper idea of what it would look like I should have thought more about scale.Ah I see! Had me fooled (not difficult admittedly).
That will depend on the width of the rims.Are all the pepper pot wheels 15 inch? What tyres should be fixed to them?
As far as I know the style 36 are all 15". Taller tyres needed. Profile /70 maybe.Are all the pepper pot wheels 15 inch? What tyres should be fixed to them?
How does the dsc/asc know that the rolling radius has changed? It can't know that the car travels a little bit further each rotation of the wheels.That will depend on the width of the rims.
My new wires are 15" x 6" so will just about take 205mm widths. With 65 profiles they will be very slightly larger diameter than the staggered 17" on the car now. 195mm x 65 profiles would be a better fit for the rims and the diameter but they just look a little 'weedy'.
It's worth noting that cars with DSC (not sure about ASC) do not like a rolling circumference change of more than around 3%. It can play havoc with the DSC operation.
It measures the rotational distance against speed. If there is a certain difference in speed of the rear wheels it applies the brakes to the faster wheel. I have seen this discussed on another BMW forum (so it's third party info), but apparently the 'data' for any given model is programmed into the DSC brain (I can't remember the module TBH). If the programmed parameters change by too much, it doesn't know whether it is on foot-or-horseback as it can't compute anything other than approx +-3%. Chances are it just won't work as well as it did, but it is generally a system that isn't intrusive anyway.How does the dsc/asc know that the rolling radius has changed? It can't know that the car travels a little bit further each rotation of the wheels.
I'm willing to give it a try with too tall tyres. The arches are so big they need filling.
Cos the speed of the wheel for a given rolling radius is pre-set in the DSC module by programming. Yes, the speedo will read wrong, but that is not where the 'speed' or 'distance travelled over time' is calculated for the DSC.It calculates the speed based off of the rotation of the output shaft. It uses what it 'thinks' is the rolling radius of the wheel to calculate speed.
How would it know if fhe rolling radius is different. It has no other way to calculate/know speed. It'll simply calculate the speed wrong.
Er. I think.
Like it! That’s a ‘thinking outside the box’ solution if ever there was oneWheel arch liners. Don't fit exactly but near enough and quite neat.
View attachment 312993
View attachment 312991
View attachment 312995
Edit.
Forgot to mention. The plastic sheet is one of those black plastic builder's tubs you get in B&Q. I tried 4mm rubber sheet but too wobbly. This B&Q tub is real easy to cut, very flexi but quite ridgid once screwed in place.
I can answer that from my Kobra experience at least. I have been taking mine for MOTs for 4 years plus and only last year did I have a discussion about what the car was. I have a Kobra dash and replacement steering wheel so it becomes very relevant.Did your MOT tester not ask any questions why it doesn't look like a Z3 anymore?
Or did he/she/they/it just treat it as per the DVLA info, as you have a standard interior and airbags, etc?
I understood, from previous dealings on Cobra forums, that it can be tricky if the car is registered as one thing (a Z3), but presented as something else.
Just interested.