Hi Dan, yes, I have also fitted a weichers front strut brace, but that is about all the budget will allow for now(!)...had the Bilstein B6's/rear bushes fitted a year ago as the stock shocks were degassed...what a difference in handling!...for the other upgrades...the engine is now all done, but still waiting for the computer adaptor for the remap (don't want to risk driving untill after the remap)...so it is very frustrating not trying it out at the moment.... and the transmission/LSD work should be completed within 3 months I think. We had the engine apart & it is almost 'as new' condition (only 50,000 miles on the clock over 14 years)..lovely. A few people have said I should have purchased an Z3M instead....maybe(?)...but i got the car near 18 months ago very cheap & the M version I saw was 5 times the price (for same year 1998)...& so I got the cheaper 2.8...spent a bit, then a bit more, then a bit more still, then upgrade etc...so when you starting going down that road...you really don't want to part with it! ...you know every part of the car intimately..I could list out all the other work I have done...like brakes etc, but the list is too long!.Totally, the money I have spent/will spend (including purchase price) on totally restoring my 2.8 to perfect order & 'better than new' in terms of performance & handling & conversion to manual; it is about the same price as that 1998 ZM I considered which had a lot more miles (but was manual) and I would have certainly spent a lot of extra money bringing it up to the same 'mint condition' as there was 'worn out this' & 'worn out that' as you would expect from a well used 14 year old car...so all in all, I think my route has been cheaper & it is very exciting & rewarding to restore/modify your own Z & put your personality on it....Also, if I put my modified 2.8 with it's lower gear ratio next to a stock Z3M of the same age, there would not be too much difference (if any) from 0 to 60 mph I would have thought. The stock 1998 2.8 Z3 (single vanos) has a BHP of I think 189 (possibly 193?) & estimates put my current Z3 at just over 250(? - any thoughts on that number Dan?)...maybe more(?) still less than the ZM's 320BHP, but my gearing should be lower.
I have decided against Supercharging as it is a bit obvious when looking under the bonnet & would not pass an MOT with one fitted here (unless factory standard)...high flow exhuast manifold & high flow cat may be next year....anyway, I intend to keep my Z3 2.8 untill I am too old to get in & out of it(!) & I stand no chance of getting my money back if i sold it, but on the other hand, will not lose the much greater amount in depreciation had a purchased say a brand new 2.5 or 3.0 Z4...& am a big fan of the retro styled Z3 & not so much the (technically better) Z4...all personal taste though...