Neither did I, thanks for sharing the info. Might come in handy one day.personally never heard of this before.
The symptoms you describe….Just for the record of this thread and since this turned out to be a surprise, the ECU the car had was not the original.
It dated two years later and seemed to have some sort of short cirquit happened in the past
Proof of that is a black electrical arch embroidery on the box.
The strangest of all is that id did not throw any codes nor other signs of malfunction.
Damn electronics.
case closed the car now runs fine.
That’s some good detective work from a garage - can I ask what the total bill was from the garage for that?Just for the record of this thread and since this turned out to be a surprise, the ECU the car had was not the original.
It dated two years later and seemed to have some sort of short cirquit happened in the past
Proof of that is a black electrical arch embroidery on the box.
The strangest of all is that id did not throw any codes nor other signs of malfunction.
Damn electronics.
case closed the car now runs fine.
200 labor and 340 for replacing and coding the ecu.That’s some good detective work from a garage - can I ask what the total bill was from the garage for that?
Most probably this is the best explanation. But wouldnt it pop the asc light? Maybe not if the ecu was fried...The symptoms you describe….
“Put any gear, car moves and revs dont pick up as they are supposed to. It takes time to climb the scale and acts as if something is blocking the engine to rev. And when it does there is no power like there is supposed to be”
…..seem to describe the action of the ASC ( or DSC?) traction control system. Wonder if the old ECU ‘thought’ the signals from the wheel rotation sensors or speedometer meant that it limited the engine power? It wouldn’t throw an error code because it would have ‘thought’ that this was a normal operational occurrence.