But he still hasn't admitted doing it on purpose, only sorry he did it.
Tony.
Tony.
FIA looked at Hamilton's telemetry data, no brake test was carried out they report. If that's the case Vettel took his eye off the ball and ran into the back of him.Vettel shoud have kept his head ,after Hamilton deliberately brake tested him,iff he hadn't banged his front tyres against the Merc ,I think Hamilton would be the one having a penalty.
Might make for some good old fashioned F1 racing, Prost and Senna anyone?........only sorry he did it.
HopefullyMight make for some good old fashioned F1 racing, Prost and Senna anyone?........
Hill was just to nice. Not ruthless enough.He's another Schumacher. Ask Damon Hill.
Tony.
You may be right there Andy, what he should have done is wait for Schumacher to retire as he inevitably would have done, but he expected, rightly so that he would not swerve across the track to just take him out. That didn't go so well!Hill was just to nice. Not ruthless enough.
He has now admitted it was deliberate and (grudgingly) apologised (even if only in a text).But he still hasn't admitted doing it on purpose, only sorry he did it.
Tony.
The way I understood it was they're hoping to 're negotiate with the new F1 owners as Ecclestone would but nudge on his take or leave it deal.The end of F1 at Silverstone?
http://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/40518666
The BBC are reporting with greater emphasis that Silverstone is about to bail out of its F1 contract due to ever increasing costs attached to the existing agreement. They cite that, unlike many state supported race and venues, that they, as a self funding club, are likely to go bust (taking all British motor racing with it) if they stay in the game.
If it happens, will it dampen your interest if F1?
Or will the F1 circus quietly find some way of keeping Silverstone in the itinerary?
Sky tv will be bricking it if another major event drops out their schedules....
But that leaves the new F1 owners with a massive problem. Let one do it then all the venues will want a reduction.The way I understood it was they're hoping to 're negotiate with the new F1 owners as Ecclestone would but nudge on his take or leave it deal.
Tony.
Indeed - quietly shuffle away a couple of £m to keep the sponsors on side. By far the lesser of two evils. No viewers = no revenue = no backers. Bite the commercial side at your own risk.Perhaps it's something they're expecting and why they're concentrating on the media side of it where Ecclestone never went?
Tony.