Now i know the arguments, why bother modifying a 1.9 get a 2.8 etc etc, well for me its not about just getting a bigger engine with more power and extra cylinders, i like to tinker, i like to look at something and say what if? Well i chose the 1.9 because i can work on it, i can change things or fix them, normally fix them........
I have been on a journey (still travelling), i have modified the body to wide rear format like the 2.8, i have lowered it and stiffened the springs and ARB's, and uprated the brakes to 3.0 vented discs and callipers, this has bought a lot of smiles to my face whilst driving the back roads. but the thing that has niggled me has been it just needs that 5% more from the engine department, yes a stainless exhaust and induction kit made it sound like 5% more but it was just those few instances when you just new if just slightly tweaked it would be the perfect roadster.
Well i researched this in detail, i have looked at Turbo's, and DASC, but just too much modification required and then you have a real frankenstein and it has cost you an arm and a leg, so as i have a limited hobby budget, i have had to say no. The search has lead me to 3 options, remap, diff change and flywheel modification, so which one, well i have ruled out the diff change as they are like hens teeth, and people covet them so much the cost nearly as much as a DASC, so option binned for the moment, plus i think the trade off of cruising speed v acceleration is just too much for a road car (Good for a 1/4 miler). So remap and flywheel, well the clutch judders when cold, so i have opted to go this route first and then the remap as the icing on the cake.
So Flywheels and clutches, The M44 has a DMF (Dual Mass Flywheel) they are very heavy, help with torque but are parasitic to draining the engine power, how much you say, well its to the tune that if you shaved 10lb off one you would gain 34BHP (virtual) in first gear, 28 in second, 18 in third, 10 in fourth and 5 in 5th. This sounds good, and in theory it is very good and backed up by calculation, we should all do it yes? well the problem is the DMF it cannot be modified, its a very intricate and heavily engineered component, and nobody has the skill to do it. The option therefore is to fit a single mass fly wheel, they are available in various expensive forms from the states, you can even put in an M3 flywheel and clutch or a Valeo conversion kit, problem is these are the same weight as the DMF so that you do not notice any difference in driving, so no point in just swapping these out. Answer therefore get one modified, have the fly wheel lightened and balanced, well that is my solution, but today ended up in a fortunate twist.
Having broken up for xmas break, decided to get my recent Valeo purchase down to a highly recommended engine builder MJA Automotive Engineering, owned by Martin Adams, i had gotten a price and lead time over the phone and was going to post it, however i was not quite convinced it had enough meat to allow it to be lightened, and certainly not enough to reduce by 10lbs. Today i took a drive to see Martin, we looked at the flywheel together, and with Martins experience and witness to a few exploding flywheels agreed it was not worth doing, especially if it could not be done safely, after a brief batting of ideas Martin said "Why don't i make you one from Aluminium", this seems the perfect idea, it can be made to the same dimensions and saves the weight without any loss of integrity. So we agreed the price, had a tour of his work shop including engine dyno and race cars and confirmed i would collect it at the end of January.
Once i have the flywheels back i will do some weight comparisons, and then some logged driving runs on the existing DMF prior to changing over to the new one. I will update this thread as i go along.