For the life of me I cannot understand why someone would not do the tracking, it is all standard Z3 isn’t it?
Tony.
ps. Looking forward to the “tuning” developments.
Tony.
ps. Looking forward to the “tuning” developments.
I think it's a case of "Computer says no." The system they have you just plug in the make and model and it knows what it should be. Without that he wasn't confident to make adjustments. Mine is sort of standard but it's on coilovers and the weight distribution is obviously different. So I figured I'd take it elsewhere.For the life of me I cannot understand why someone would not do the tracking, it is all standard Z3 isn’t it?
Tony.
ps. Looking forward to the “tuning” developments.
I couldn't believe it when the tested told me the solution to the rusty hole in my rear wing was duct tape. Lack of sills is a minor issue by comparison!ANY bolt on panels are simply bodywork and so long as there are no projections or sharp edges it's fine. If your MOT station (testers) don't know that they should be reported to VOSA.
Tony.
I'll try and find that tomorrow Tom.
Tony.
Sorry that you are experiencing all these issues Tom, but, as a Pioneer (for that is what you are) I hope you can surmount all the problems and continue with the build. Have a good break and get back to it as and when you can. Watching with great interest from near Lincoln.Taken from my blog post, titled 'Fail, but in a bad way'...
"I went into the first MOT test with genuinely zero expectation that we would pass. I needed a to-do list but there were some things I thought would rule out a pass first time. So when we failed so narrowly, I was elated.
Going into the retest I was much more nervous. It felt like there was a real chance we would pass. I was infected with hope. As you may have guessed from the title of this post, that hope was swiftly dashed.
Things started well enough. The drive over started great, with the car feeling much more planted, the brakes now being on good form, and the tuning I’d done making it much more lively. There was only one event where we suddenly lost torque but it came straight back.
But the closer we got to the MOT station, the more the occasional squeak from the engine bay that had appeared on the previous visit became a persistent squeal.
Handing the keys over to the mechanic, he took it for a short drive down the road. It stalled and wouldn’t restart. And that squeak just got louder.
Between the stall, the squeak, and the fact that my eyeballed attempt at tracking was off the mark, he refused to do the retest saying he couldn’t be confident the car was safe for the road.
Gutted.
So, we brought the car home again for more work. The tracking is simple enough – I got the wheels straight relative to each other but didn’t realise you also needed to align the steering wheel so that it is ‘straight’ when the wheels are straight. I was going to leave that to the professionals once I got the car good enough for the road. Rookie mistake. Lesson learned. But the drop-out events and the squeak are much more of an issue.
I decided to turn my deflated frustration into motion and set about stripping the whole lot down to find the cause of the squeak. A little testing had made it very clear it was coming from the coupler that sits between the motor and gearbox. I had always been aware this could be an issue but in all my early testing, it seemed to be fine. Only when it had been driven under load a couple of times did its weaknesses become apparent.
Removing it means taking almost everything from the car: draining cooling loops, stripping off the front bumper and valance, dropping the battery box, jacking up the transmission, disconnecting low and high voltage wiring, removing the inverter and charger, and unbolting the mounting frame. Only then can you split the motor from the adaptor plate and remove the coupler.
Sure enough, it is bent. In rotation, one end clearly moves back and forth by at least a millimetre. And at least one of the splined clutch centres is not square. Whether it was when I first put it in, I just don’t know. After all is was made with a hammer on a Black and Decker workmate, not in a proper machine shop. I thought it was good enough but clearly not.
The hard truth is that I’m not going to get in for a retest within the ten day limit. Instead, I’m going to have to send the coupler off to a machine shop. And then hope that when it returns, the motor will still bolt up to the adaptor plate once it is properly aligned with the gearbox. It will be September before I can try again.
In the meantime, I hope I can resolve the tuning issues and understand why I’m losing traction. And sort out the issues with the battery management system that have left me charging manually.
Until next time…"
Thank you. Feeling alright about it this morning. Opportunity to make some upgrades while it's all apart. But first, a break!Chin up hey Tom. You're a big winner for getting this far and the current issue won't stop you. A setback but will only affect timing of the completion.
Thanks Dave. Much appreciated.Hi Tom,
This has been a great read. Just gone start to finish. Well done to you as your attitude to problem solving has been very inspiring.
I’d love to EV my Tribute Kobra as know it is the way forward for cars ‘ with individuality’.
Best of luck with the next stages.
On a side note I would check with Chris at Tribute regarding the 300S model as I’m not sure it is part of his std portfolio these days.
Thanks again and keep going.
Dave
I would call Chris as unsure that he will be at Stoneleigh. Not as an exhibitor anyway. I have not spoken to him in months but know that Stoneleigh gave new dates quickly and so some companies are more ready than others in having stands etc.Thanks Dave. Much appreciated.
And thanks for the info on Tribute. That model is still on the website but not sure how up to date that is. Hoping to see them at Stoneleigh but will give them a bell if not.